time does not flow -- 7/11/18

Today's selection -- from The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene. From Einstein's perspective, time does not flow:

"Does time really flow? If it does, what actually is flowing? And how fast does this time-stuff flow? Does time really have an arrow? Space, for example, does not appear to have an inherent arrow -- to an astronaut in the dark recesses of the cosmos, left and right, back and forth, and up and down, would all be on equal footing -- so where would an arrow of time come from? If there is an arrow of time, is it absolute? Or are there things that can evolve in a direction opposite to the way time's arrow seems to point?

"Let's build up to our current understanding by first thinking about these questions in the context of classical physics. ...

"From the perspective of sentient beings, the answer seems obvious. As I type these words, I clearly feel time flowing. With every keystroke, each now gives way to the next. As you read these words, you no doubt feel time flowing, too, as your eyes scan from word to word across the page. Yet, as hard as physicists have tried, no one has found any convincing evidence within the laws of physics that supports this intuitive sense that time flows. In fact, a reframing of some of Einstein's insights from special relativity provides evidence that time does not flow.

"To understand this, let's return to the loaf-of-bread depiction of space­time [previously] introduced. Recall that the slices making up the loaf are the nows of a given observer; each slice represents space at one moment of time from his or her perspective. The union obtained by plac­ing slice next to slice, in the order in which the observer experiences them, fills out a region of spacetime. If we take this perspective to a logi­cal extreme and imagine that each slice depicts all of space at a given moment of time according to one observer's viewpoint, and if we include every possible slice, from the ancient past to the distant future, the loaf will encompass all of the universe throughout all time -- the whole of spacetime. Every occurrence, regardless of when or where, is represented by some point in the loaf. ...

Artist concept of Gravity Probe B orbiting the Earth to measure space-time, a four-dimensional description
of the universe including height, width, length, and time.

"The perspective should make you scratch your head. The 'outside' perspective of the fig­ure, in which we're looking at the whole universe, all of space at every moment of time, is a fictitious vantage point, one that none of us will ever have. We are all within spacetime. Every experience you or I ever have occurs at some location in space at some moment of time. And since [the loaf-of-bread depiction] is meant to depict all of spacetime, it encompasses the totality of such experiences -- yours, mine, and those of everyone and everything. If you could zoom in and closely examine all the comings and goings on planet earth, you'd be able to see Alexander the Great having a lesson with Aristotle, Leonardo da Vinci laying the final brushstroke on the Mona Lisa, and George Washington crossing the Delaware; as you con­tinued scanning the image from left to right, you'd be able to see your grandmother playing as a little girl, your father celebrating his tenth birth­day, and your own first day at school; looking yet farther to the right in the image, you could see yourself reading this book, the birth of your great­-great-granddaughter, and, a little farther on, her inauguration as Presi­dent. Given the coarse resolution ... you can't actually see these moments, but you can see the (schematic) history of the sun and planet earth, from their birth out of a coalescing gas cloud to the earth's demise when the sun swells into a red giant. It's all there."

 | www.delanceyplace.com


Brian Greene


The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time and the Texture of Reality


Vintage Books


Copyright 2004 by Brian R. Greene


barns and noble booksellers
Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org

All delanceyplace profits are donated to charity and support children’s literacy projects.


Sign in or create an account to comment


Tuesday at 11:32pm
You say time appears to flow. Then you say it doesn't appears to flow. You talk about what would happen if you cut history like a loaf of bread. How do you know what it really looks like if you never did it. Maybe we would see time flow in a way you didn’t expect. Let's use your method and cut up a dog like a loaf of bread. If you cut up a dog like a loaf of bread it would be dead. Should we conclude that there is no life either? Should we conclude living things do not move because they do not move ofter you slice them up like a loaf of bread. It is true that there is no flow of time in physics equations but that is a fault of the equation not of our experience. This just another example scientific laziness. If scientists can’t explain something they deny that it exists. You want people to reject empiricism and believe you rather than believe what they see right before their eyes.. You are doing the same thing that religions do. If I reject the reality of my experience I do not have to believe in science I am free to believe in most any wacky idea that I want.


July 11
Time was, is and will always be as Frank Sinatra sung: in hid chorus:

I've been a puppet, a pauper, a pirate
A poet, a pawn and a king
I've been up and down and over and out
And I know one thing:
Each time I find myself laying flat on my face
I just pick myself up and get back in the race

<< prev - comments page 1 of 1 - next >>